Section 380-402
Theft in Dwelling House; Theft by Clerk; Theft After Preparation for Hurt; Extortion by Putting in Fear; Extortion by Threat of Accusation; Extortion by Threat of Death; Robbery — Attempt; Robbery with Hurt; Dacoity with Murder; Robbery with Deadly Weapon; Robbery During Preparing Dacoity; Robbery Forming Dacoity; Assembling for Dacoity; Belonging to Dacoity Gang
Replaced by: BNS BNS 186-215
Original Text
Simplified
Legal Evolution
Sections 380-402 address aggravated forms of theft and extortion, including theft in dwellings, theft by clerks, theft by carriers, and the transition from theft to robbery and dacoity. This carefully graduated scheme reflects the colonial government's recognition that property crimes occur across a spectrum of culpability, with location, relationship, and use of force as key aggravating factors. The provisions remain the primary framework for property crime prosecution in India despite the enactment of specialized fraud legislation.
Landmark Precedents
Phool Kumar v. Delhi Administration (1975)
Section 397's mandatory 7-year minimum for armed robbery/dacoity is non-discretionary — courts cannot reduce the sentence even in mitigating circumstances.