362 vs 138
The definition of Abduction by force or deceit has moved from IPC 362 to BNS 138.
What Changed?
Direct renumbering from 362 to 138.
No conceptual changes in the definition.
Verdict
"Continues to distinguish abduction (often an auxiliary crime) from kidnapping."
Detailed Analysis
362
Section Data Pending
138
Section Data Pending
Legal Implications
Practical Scenarios
"Forcing someone into a vehicle at gunpoint (BNS 138)."
"Lying to a person to get them to go to a secluded place for criminal purposes (BNS 138)."
Expert Q&A
Is abduction a standalone offence?
Abduction is generally punishable when combined with intent to do harm (e.g., BNS 140-144).
What is the difference between abduction (362) and kidnapping (360/361)?
Abduction (Section 362) applies to persons of any age and requires force or deceit. Kidnapping from guardianship (Section 361) applies only to minors (boys under 16, girls under 18) and requires no force — merely taking them without guardian's consent suffices. A minor's consent is irrelevant in kidnapping; in abduction, an adult's free consent negates the offence.
Is abduction a standalone punishable offence?
Abduction (Section 362) is a definitional provision without standalone punishment. It becomes punishable when combined with a specific criminal purpose — murder (Section 364), ransom (Section 364A), compelled marriage (Section 366), or forced labour (Section 374).
What is the BNS equivalent of IPC 362?
IPC Section 362 (Abduction definition) is now BNS Section 138. The definition is unchanged — compelling or inducing any person to move from any place using force or deceitful means.
Deepen Your Legal Knowledge
Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.
Explore All Comparisons