BACK TO SECTIONS
Side-by-Side Comparison

354 vs 74

IPC Section 354 (Assault or Criminal Force to Outrage Modesty of a Woman) maps directly to BNS Section 74 with identical punishment: minimum 1 year to maximum 5 years imprisonment + fine. Non-Bailable under both Acts.

What Changed?

Direct renumbering from IPC 354 to BNS 74 — no change in the offence definition.

Punishment identical: minimum 1 year to maximum 5 years imprisonment + fine (mandatory minimum introduced in 2013 preserved).

Non-Bailable and Cognizable status unchanged — police can arrest without warrant.

The test of 'outraging modesty' remains objective: would the act outrage the modesty of a reasonable woman? (State of Punjab v. Major Singh, 1966).

BNS 74 sits in a restructured Chapter V on 'Offences Against Women' — making the women-centric protection more visible as a standalone chapter.

All prior Supreme Court and High Court judgments interpreting IPC 354 continue to apply to BNS 74 with full precedential force.

Verdict

"The law on physical molestation retains full continuity. The mandatory minimum of 1 year (introduced in 2013 via the Criminal Law Amendment Act) is preserved under BNS 74. The vast judicial interpretation developed over 150+ years under IPC 354 — including the landmark Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill case — applies with full force to BNS 74 prosecutions."

Detailed Analysis

OLD LAW (IPC)

354

Act of 1860

Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty

Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.
PunishmentMin 1 year to 5 years + Fine
REFORM
NEW LAW (BNS)

74

Act of 2024

Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty

Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any woman, intending to outrage or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby outrage her modesty, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Punishment1 to 5 years + Fine
1860
354 Origin
2024
74 Reform

Legal Implications

IPC Section 354 / BNS Section 74 is one of the most invoked provisions in Indian criminal law for physical acts of molestation and sexual indecency. The offence requires three elements: (1) assault or use of criminal force on a woman; (2) intention or knowledge that the act will outrage her modesty; and (3) the woman must be a woman. The critical concept is 'modesty' — the Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Major Singh (1966) established the foundational test: modesty is 'the attribute of a female aroused by the presence of a man she has no reason to trust — it is not an attribute that can be attributed to an unconscious or very young victim who cannot be outraged.' The court then evolved the objective test: would the act be considered outraging the modesty of a reasonable woman in all the circumstances? The landmark Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1995) case — where Punjab Police DGP KPS Gill was convicted for slapping IPS officer Rupan Deol Bajaj on her posterior at an official dinner — established that a person's seniority or authority provides no immunity, and that even a brief single act of deliberate sexual indecency in a social/official setting constitutes Section 354. The intent requirement can be inferred from the nature of the act — in most cases, intent is presumed from the nature of the assault on a woman. The 2013 Criminal Law Amendment Act strengthened Section 354 by introducing the mandatory minimum of 1 year, removing the discretion to impose a lower sentence. BNS 74 carries this entire framework forward intact.

Practical Scenarios

"Forcibly touching a woman inappropriately in a crowded bus — Section 354/BNS 74 (Non-Bailable)."

"A senior officer pinching or slapping a subordinate female employee — Section 354/BNS 74 (applies regardless of authority, per Rupan Bajaj)."

"Grabbing a woman's dupatta/clothing with intent to disrobe — Section 354/BNS 74 (and potentially 354B/BNS 76 if intent is to disrobe)."

"Attempting to hug or kiss a woman who clearly objects — Section 354/BNS 74."

"A stranger forcibly making physical contact on public transport while making obscene gestures — Section 354/BNS 74."

Expert Q&A

What is the BNS equivalent of IPC 354?

IPC Section 354 (Assault or Criminal Force to Outrage Modesty of a Woman) is now BNS Section 74. The law is identical — same offence definition, same punishment (1 to 5 years), same Non-Bailable status. All prior case law applies.

What is the punishment for IPC 354 / BNS 74?

Minimum 1 year to maximum 5 years rigorous imprisonment + fine. The 1-year mandatory minimum was introduced by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013. Judges cannot impose less than 1 year. The offence is Cognizable (police can register FIR without magistrate order) and Non-Bailable.

Is Section 354 / BNS 74 bailable?

No. IPC 354 and its equivalent BNS 74 are Non-Bailable offences. The accused must apply to court for bail. Police cannot release on station bail. The offence is triable by the Magistrate of First Class.

What is the difference between IPC 354 and IPC 354A?

Section 354 (BNS 74) requires physical assault or criminal force — touching or forcing physical contact. Section 354A (BNS 75) covers non-physical sexual harassment: verbal sexual remarks, showing pornography, demanding sexual favours. Section 354 is Non-Bailable (1-5 years); most sub-sections of 354A are Bailable (up to 3 years or 1 year). A single incident may attract both if there is both physical and verbal harassment.

What does 'outraging modesty' mean in Indian law?

The Supreme Court in State of Punjab v. Major Singh (1966) established that modesty is the attribute associated with feminine decency and reserve — and the test is objective: would the act outrage the modesty of a reasonable woman in those circumstances? The victim's personal reaction is not the test — the nature of the act is assessed against the standard of a reasonable woman.

Can a woman file 354/BNS 74 against a husband?

The provision applies to any person using criminal force on a woman with the intent to outrage her modesty. Marital rape is not specifically excluded from Section 354, but its prosecution is complex given the marital rape exception in Section 375 (rape). Courts have allowed 354 cases within marriage where the act goes beyond sexual intercourse to deliberate acts of indecency or humiliation.

How did the Rupan Bajaj case strengthen Section 354?

The Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1995) case established two crucial principles: (1) No person, however senior in rank or authority, is immune from prosecution under Section 354; (2) Even a single brief act of deliberate sexual indecency — even at a social gathering — constitutes the offence. This significantly expanded the section's application beyond obvious cases of physical assault to include acts by powerful figures in professional settings.

What is the difference between IPC 354 and IPC 509 (word/gesture to insult modesty)?

Section 354 requires physical assault or use of criminal force (touching, grabbing, pushing). Section 509 covers words, sounds, gestures, or display of objects intended to insult a woman's modesty — no physical contact required. Section 509 is Bailable with far shorter imprisonment (up to 3 years under BNS). Verbal sexual harassment or wolf-whistling attracts Section 509, while physical molestation attracts Section 354.

Does the same case law on IPC 354 apply to BNS 74?

Yes, entirely. BNS 74 is a direct renumbering of IPC 354 with identical language. All Supreme Court and High Court judgments interpreting IPC 354 — including Major Singh (1966), Rupan Bajaj (1995), and Raju Mahale (2004) — remain binding precedent for BNS 74 cases.

Legal Glossary

Related Legal Terms

Browse full Legal Glossary

Continue Reading

Related Comparisons.

Deepen Your Legal Knowledge

Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.

Explore All Comparisons