307 vs 109
IPC Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) maps directly to BNS Section 109 with identical punishment structure: up to 10 years if no hurt is caused, and life imprisonment if hurt results.
What Changed?
IPC 307 and BNS 109 are substantively identical — same elements, same two-tier punishment.
Punishment Tier 1: If the act does not cause any hurt — up to 10 years imprisonment + fine.
Punishment Tier 2: If the act causes hurt to any person — up to life imprisonment + fine.
The offence is complete when an act is done with murderous intent under circumstances where death would constitute murder — whether or not the victim is actually harmed.
BNS 109 is charged alongside BNS 103 (murder) when multiple victims are involved — 103 for the victim who died, 109 for survivors of the same attack.
Verdict
"No substantive change in the law of attempted murder. The two-tier punishment structure — escalating from 10 years to life imprisonment when hurt is actually caused — is fully preserved under BNS 109."
Detailed Analysis
307
Attempt to Murder
109
Attempt to Murder
Legal Implications
Practical Scenarios
"Firing a gun at someone's head but missing entirely — BNS 109 (up to 10 years, no hurt tier)."
"Stabbing a person in the abdomen intending to kill, but the victim survives — BNS 109 with hurt (up to Life Imprisonment)."
"Administering poison in a dose expected to kill, but the victim recovers — BNS 109."
"In an attack killing one victim and injuring another — BNS 103 (murder) for the deceased and BNS 109 (attempt) for the survivor."
"Throwing acid at a person's face — BNS 109 (hurt caused tier, Life Imprisonment) + specific acid attack provisions."
Expert Q&A
What is the BNS equivalent of IPC 307 (Attempt to Murder)?
IPC Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) is now BNS Section 109. The provision is identical in every way — same offence definition, same two-tier punishment (up to 10 years / Life Imprisonment if hurt caused), same Non-Bailable and Cognizable status, same trial in Sessions Court.
Can someone be convicted under 307/BNS 109 if they missed and caused no injury?
Yes. The Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. Balram Bama Patil (1983) held that Section 307 is complete even without physical injury — provided the act was done with murderous intent and was capable of causing death. Missing the target means the lower punishment tier applies (up to 10 years), not that the accused is acquitted.
What are the elements the prosecution must prove for attempt to murder?
Three elements: (1) Intent or knowledge that the act would constitute murder if death resulted (same mental state as for murder under BNS 103); (2) Some act done toward the commission of the murder (not mere preparation); (3) The act is sufficiently proximate to the intended murder. If all three are proved, BNS 109 applies — whether or not actual hurt was caused (which affects only the punishment tier).
What is the difference between IPC 307/BNS 109 (Attempt to Murder) and IPC 308 (Attempt to Culpable Homicide)?
Section 307/BNS 109 requires intent equivalent to murder (IPC 300/BNS 100). Section 308 requires intent equivalent only to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (IPC 304/BNS 105) — a lower degree of culpability. The punishment ceiling for Section 308 is much lower: 3 years (no hurt) or 7 years (hurt caused), compared to 307's 10 years and Life. Courts determine which applies based on the specific mental state of the accused.
Is Section 307 / BNS 109 bailable?
No. Both IPC 307 and BNS 109 are Non-Bailable and Cognizable offences triable exclusively by the Court of Session. The accused must apply to the Sessions Court or High Court for bail. Courts generally apply strict bail standards given the seriousness of the charge, though bail is possible with conditions where the accused poses no flight risk and there's no danger of tampering with evidence.
Can the same accused be charged with both murder (302/103) and attempt to murder (307/109)?
Not for the same attack on the same victim — if death results it is 103 (murder); if death does not result it is 109 (attempt). However, in multi-victim attacks (e.g., a bombing that kills three and wounds two), the accused faces BNS 103 for those who died and BNS 109 for those who were hurt but survived. This double-charging in high-profile cases (riots, gang wars, terrorist attacks) is standard practice.
Can an acid attack be prosecuted under BNS 109?
Yes. If an acid attack is committed with intent to kill (not merely to disfigure), BNS 109 applies and the maximum punishment is Life Imprisonment (since hurt is always caused). Acid attacks with intent to cause grievous hurt/disfigurement (not kill) are prosecuted under specific acid attack provisions in the BNS. In most acid attack cases, both sections are charged in the alternative.
Can Section 307/BNS 109 be reduced to a lesser offence?
Yes — courts can convict for a lesser included offence if the evidence establishes it. Common reductions: (1) if intent to murder is not proved but intent to cause grievous hurt is — conviction under Section 325/BNS 118; (2) if only intent to annoy or hurt (not kill) is proved — simple hurt provisions. Courts assess the nature of the weapon, the body part targeted, and the surrounding circumstances to determine the precise mental state.
How is attempted murder different from grievous hurt (Section 325/BNS 118)?
The critical distinction is intent: Section 307/BNS 109 requires intent that would constitute murder if death resulted. Section 325/BNS 118 covers intentional or knowing causation of grievous hurt without necessarily the intent to kill. A person who stabs another in the arm intending only to injure (not kill) faces Section 325/BNS 118 (7 years). A person who stabs another in the heart intending to kill but the victim miraculously survives faces Section 307/BNS 109 (Life Imprisonment).
Related IPC Sections
Related BNS Sections
Legal Glossary
Related Legal Terms
The guilty mind — the mental element or criminal intent required for an act to constitute a crime.
latinThe guilty act — the physical act or omission that constitutes the external element of a crime.
latinA shared criminal purpose making each participant equally liable for acts done in furtherance of that purpose.
criminalContinue Reading
Related Comparisons.
Deepen Your Legal Knowledge
Explore more side-by-side comparisons of the Indian Law reforms 2024. Detailed analysis for lawyers, students, and legal practitioners.
Explore All Comparisons