BACK TO SECTIONSAIR 1961 SC 1782AIR 1981 SC 1972
Non-BailableCognizable: YesCourt of Session
Reform Highlights
1
Direct renumbering from IPC 307 to BNS 109.
2
Punishment terms and graduated structure unchanged.
THE STATUTE
The Clause
Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge, and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of murder, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if hurt is caused to any person by such act, the offender shall be liable either to imprisonment for life or to such punishment as is hereinbefore mentioned.
Legal Commentary
Section 109 punishes the attempt to commit murder — with a graduated structure that depends on whether physical harm was actually caused. The section targets the 'dangerousness of the mind' — the offender's intention or knowledge that the act would constitute murder if death resulted — and punishes that state of mind regardless of the outcome. Where no hurt is caused (a missed shot, a failed poisoning), the maximum is 10 years. Where hurt is actually caused to the victim (injuries that fall short of death), the punishment escalates to life imprisonment — recognising that the victim suffered real harm and the offender came extremely close to completing the murder. The mental element required is identical to that of murder itself: the act must be done with such intention or knowledge that if death resulted, it would be murder. This means that all the analysis around murder's four clauses and five exceptions applies equally to attempted murder. A person who, under sudden provocation, stabs someone but the victim survives — that may be an attempt to commit culpable homicide (BNS 110), not an attempt to murder, if the provocation exception would have applied.
Landmark Precedents
Om Prakash v. State of Punjab (1961)
RELEVANCE
Supreme Court held that for an attempt to murder charge, the prosecution must establish that had death resulted, it would have been murder — the same mental element as murder itself.
Vasant Vitthal Kasture v. State of Maharashtra (1981)
RELEVANCE
Confirmed the graduated punishment approach — life imprisonment applicable when actual hurt is caused in the course of the attempted murder.
Case Simulations
"Firing a gun at a person with the intent to kill, but the bullet misses completely — BNS 109, up to 10 years."
"Stabbing a person intending to kill, but the victim survives after surgery — BNS 109, potential life imprisonment since hurt was caused."
"Poisoning a person's food intending to kill them, but the dose is insufficient and they only suffer nausea — BNS 109, question of whether 'hurt' was caused affects the applicable punishment."
Expert Insights
No. The imprisonment terms and fine provisions remain consistent with IPC 307 — up to 10 years where no hurt is caused, life imprisonment where hurt is caused to the victim.
If no hurt at all is caused, the maximum is 10 years under BNS 109. If the bullet grazes the victim or causes any injury (even minor), the maximum escalates to life imprisonment.