BACK TO POCSO Act 2012
POCSO Act 2012
Section 33
Procedure and Powers of Special Court
THE STATUTE
Original Text
A Special Court trying an offence under this Act, shall—
(a) try the case in camera and in the presence of the parents or any other person in whom the child reposes trust or confidence;
(b) not permit any aggressive questioning or character assassination of the child, and ensure that full dignity of the child is maintained at all times during the trial;
(c) ensure that the child is not brought face to face with the accused;
(d) record the statement of the child through a video link in the presence of a commissioner by following the procedure specified under sub-section (1) of section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974); or
(e) permit frequent breaks for the child during the trial;
(2) The Special Court shall, in all cases where the special public prosecutor or defence counsel intends to cross-examine a child witness, communicate the questions to the Special Court, which shall put such questions to the child. The court may, with the consent of the parties, allow the use of an audio-visual system with a live video link for recording of testimony of the child without requiring the child to appear in court.
(8) The Special Court shall also have the power to award for the benefit of the child, compensation to meet the medical expenses and rehabilitation needs of the child from the State Government, where the Special Court is of the opinion that rehabilitation of the child is necessary.
Legal Commentary
Section 33 is the comprehensive child-protection procedure framework for POCSO trials — it converts the abstract principle of 'child-friendly justice' into specific, enforceable court obligations. Every provision is designed to minimise the secondary trauma that court proceedings inflict on child sexual abuse victims.
**Child not confronted with accused (Section 33(c)):** The accused and child witness must not be brought face-to-face during testimony. This is implemented through screens/barriers, testimony from separate rooms via video link, or the accused being removed from the court during the child's evidence. This provision directly responds to research showing that facing their abuser is a primary cause of secondary trauma and recantation by child witnesses.
**No aggressive questioning or character assassination (Section 33(b)):** Defence counsel cannot use cross-examination to intimidate, shame, or attack the character of the child witness. Questions about the child's sexual history, suggestions that the child is lying or 'consented,' and aggressive confrontational questioning are prohibited. The court has an active obligation to protect the child from these tactics — not merely a passive power to intervene if objected to.
**Intermediary questioning (Section 33(2)):** Neither prosecution nor defence counsel speaks directly to the child witness during examination and cross-examination. Questions are communicated to the Special Court (through a 'communicator' or directly through the judge), which then puts them to the child in age-appropriate language. This eliminates the adversarial questioning dynamic from the child's experience of testimony.
**Video link testimony:** The child can testify through a live video link without entering the courtroom — eliminating the need for the child to be physically present in the intimidating court environment or in proximity to the accused.
**Support person (Section 33(a)):** The child may be accompanied by a parent, trusted adult, or support person during testimony. The support person provides emotional support without participating in proceedings.
**Victim compensation (Section 33(8)):** Section 33(8) is the compensation provision — the Special Court can award compensation to the child from the State Government for medical expenses and rehabilitation. This is separate from the fine/compensation provisions in the punishment sections (Sections 4, 6). The state pays, not the accused — making compensation available even if the accused has no assets.
Questions & Answers
Section 33(8) allows the Special Court to award compensation to the child from the State Government for medical expenses and rehabilitation. The compensation is paid by the state — not the accused — so it is available even if the accused is acquitted or has no assets. The court has discretion on the amount based on the child's rehabilitation needs.
No. Under Section 33(2), questions for cross-examination are communicated to the Special Court, which puts them to the child in appropriate language. Direct adversarial questioning of the child by either counsel is prohibited. The court acts as an intermediary to protect the child from aggressive or traumatising questioning.
Section 33(c) requires that the child not be brought face-to-face with the accused during testimony. The accused may be present behind a screen, in a separate room via video link, or the court may arrange for testimony when the accused is not visible to the child. Section 37 also requires in-camera proceedings, limiting who else can be present.