BACK TO SECTIONS
IPC 1860REPEALED

Section 354A

Sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment

Replaced by: BNS 75

BailableCognizable: Cognizable (i-iii) / Non-Cognizable (iv)Any Magistrate
THE STATUTE

Original Text

A man committing any of the following acts — (i) physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; or (ii) a demand or request for sexual favours; or (iii) showing pornography against the will of a woman; or (iv) making sexually coloured remarks, shall be guilty of the offence of sexual harassment.

Simplified

Section 354A was introduced in 2013 to codify sexual harassment as a standalone criminal offence. Unlike Section 354 (requiring force), 354A covers non-physical conduct: verbal remarks, showing pornography against will, and sexual favour demands. Four sub-sections: (i)–(iii) carry up to 3 years; (iv) sexually coloured remarks only — up to 1 year. Gender-specific — only applicable to male perpetrators. The POSH Act (civil/administrative) and Section 354A (criminal) operate in parallel — a woman can simultaneously file a POSH complaint AND a 354A FIR.

Legal Evolution

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) — the Supreme Court's landmark guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, directly influencing Section 354A's creation.

Landmark Precedents

Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

(1997) 6 SCC 241
RELEVANCE

The foundational case that led to Section 354A's creation — Vishaka Guidelines on workplace sexual harassment were directly codified into criminal law in 2013.

Practical Scenarios

"Making suggestive remarks about a coworker's body — Section 354A(iv)."
"Demanding sexual favours in exchange for promotion — Section 354A(ii)."
"Showing sexually explicit content to a woman against her will — Section 354A(iii)."

Common Queries

Yes — all sub-sections of 354A are bailable.
Yes — POSH is civil/administrative law; Section 354A is criminal law. Both can apply simultaneously.