BACK TO BSA 2023
BSA 2023ACTIVE FRAMEWORK
Section 149
Cross-Examination as to Previous Statements in Writing or Electronic Form
THE STATUTE
Original Text
A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing or in electronic form, and relevant to matters in question, without such writing or electronic record being shown to him, or being proved; but, if it is intended to contradict him by the writing or the electronic record, his attention must, before the writing or the electronic record can be proved, be called to those parts of it which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting him.
Legal Commentary
BSA Section 149 makes one key extension from IEA Section 145: 'or in electronic form' is added after 'in writing.' This seemingly minor addition has significant practical implications.
**The electronic form extension — what it means in practice:**
- WhatsApp messages: a witness who gave WhatsApp admissions can now be confronted with those messages in cross-examination (previously, there was argument about whether WhatsApp messages were 'statements in writing' under IEA S.145).
- Video statements: a witness who gave a video statement to police or an interviewer can be cross-examined on inconsistencies between the video and their court testimony.
- Audio recordings: phone call recordings capturing a witness's prior statements can be used.
- Social media posts: a witness's prior social media posts stating facts inconsistent with their court testimony can be used.
**The S.57 certificate requirement for electronic prior statements:**
To formally 'prove' the electronic prior statement (as required when contradicting a witness), the BSA Section 57 certification requirements apply. The electronic record must be accompanied by a certificate. This creates an important sequencing: in cross-examination, the advocate can ask about the WhatsApp message freely (BSA S.149 first sentence — no need to show); but to formally prove it for contradiction, a Section 57 certificate is required.
**The procedure remains the same:**
The core procedure — show the witness the relevant parts before formally proving for contradiction — is unchanged. BSA Section 149 extends the procedure to electronic statements.
Questions & Answers
Yes — BSA Section 149 explicitly covers prior statements 'in electronic form.' A WhatsApp message that is inconsistent with a witness's court testimony can be used to contradict them. The witness must be shown the relevant part before the message is formally proved. To formally prove the WhatsApp message, a Section 57 certificate from the relevant authority may be required.