BACK TO SECTIONS
BNS 2024ACTIVE FRAMEWORK

Section 84

Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman

Replaces colonial-era: IPC 498

BailableCognizable: Non-CognizableAny Magistrate

Reform Highlights

1

Direct renumbering from IPC 498 to BNS 84.

2

Retained despite the removal of adultery (IPC 497) from criminal law.

3

Substantive law unchanged.

THE STATUTE

The Clause

Whoever takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of any other man, from that man, or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person, or conceals or detains with that intent any such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

Legal Commentary

Section 84 retains a provision that has survived the decriminalisation of adultery (IPC 497 was struck down by the Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, 2018). Unlike adultery — which treated consensual extra-marital sex as a crime — BNS 84 specifically targets the act of taking away or enticing a married woman without her genuine free consent, using deceit, inducements, or coercion. The distinction is critical: a woman who freely chooses to leave her husband for another relationship commits no offence (adultery is decriminalised). But someone who lures her away through false promises, monetary enticements, or coercive tactics for the purpose of illicit intercourse commits an offence. The provision is controversial because critics argue it still treats married women as property of their husbands and removes their agency. The section survived the adultery decriminalisation specifically because it focuses on the act of 'taking or enticing' — the conduct of the third party — rather than the consensual conduct of the woman herself. In practice, the section is rarely invoked in isolation and is typically combined with other offences.

Landmark Precedents

Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018)

(2019) 3 SCC 39
RELEVANCE

Struck down IPC 497 (adultery) as unconstitutional while explicitly preserving IPC 498 (now BNS 84), drawing the line between criminalising a married woman's consensual choices and criminalising criminal enticement of a married woman.

Case Simulations

"A man who uses false promises of employment abroad to lure a married woman away from her husband for sexual exploitation — BNS 84."
"Offering a married woman substantial money to leave her husband and cohabit — if the intent is illicit intercourse and the method is enticement rather than her free choice, BNS 84."

Expert Insights

Yes. The Supreme Court in Joseph Shine specifically preserved IPC 498 (now BNS 84) because it targets the act of criminal enticement or coercive detaining — not consensual adult relationships. A woman who freely leaves her husband for another relationship commits no offence; a person who manipulates or coerces her departure for sexual exploitation does.
No. The section requires 'taking or enticing away' with criminal intent. If the woman freely chooses to enter a relationship, there is no 'enticing' in the criminal sense. The provision is aimed at predatory or coercive conduct, not consensual adult choices.